How to Start a Direct Lending Fund

To start a direct lending fund you form the standard three-entity structure — a Delaware fund limited partnership, a general partner LLC, and a management company LLC — prepare a private credit offering package (private placement memorandum, limited partnership agreement, subscription agreement), define your origination channel and covenant standards, and raise under Regulation D, most commonly as a closed-end fund with a 5–7 year term.

Direct lending means making cash-flow loans to operating companies — for emerging managers, almost always the lower middle market, where businesses with $3M–$25M of EBITDA borrow from funds because banks won't stretch and the big private credit platforms won't write $10M checks. LPs underwrite three things: where your deals come from, how your documents protect them when a borrower stumbles, and whether you can actually run a workout. This guide covers each.

Cash-Flow Lending Is a Different Craft From Asset Lending

A real estate lender's downside case is the collateral. A direct lender's downside case is a business — repayment comes from operating cash flow, and recovery in a default comes from enterprise value, not a foreclosure sale. That changes what underwriting means: customer concentration, margin durability, management quality, and industry cyclicality are the credit file, and the loan is sized against debt-service coverage and leverage multiples (total debt to EBITDA), not loan-to-value.

Your PPM should state the credit box in those terms: EBITDA range, leverage limits through your tranche, minimum coverage ratios, industries you avoid, and check size relative to fund size. LPs read a tight box the same way they read one in any credit strategy — as the discipline that will be tested in month eighteen.

Sponsored vs. Non-Sponsored: Pick Your Origination Lane

The first structural question allocators ask a direct lending manager is sponsor coverage, because the two lanes are different businesses:

  • Sponsor-backed lending: you finance private equity buyouts. Deal flow comes from PE relationships, diligence is partially done for you, and the sponsor stands behind the company with equity and (sometimes) more capital when things wobble. The trade: competitive processes compress pricing, and coverage is relationship infrastructure that takes years.
  • Non-sponsored lending: you lend directly to founder- and family-owned companies. Yields run wider and terms tougher because you're often the only institutional capital at the table — but you source deal by deal, diligence alone, and stand alone in a workout with no sponsor behind you.
  • First funds should commit to a primary lane and disclose the intended mix. 'We do both, opportunistically' reads as no origination engine in either.

Covenants and Structure: The Documents Are the Downside Case

The lower middle market is the last place in credit where full covenant packages are standard, and that's a core part of the LP pitch. Your term-sheet standards belong in the PPM: financial maintenance covenants (leverage, fixed-charge coverage) tested quarterly, EBITDA definitions that resist adjustment inflation, limits on debt incurrence and asset sales, and board observation rights where you can get them.

Structure is the other half. Senior secured first-lien is the emerging-manager default. Unitranche — one blended facility replacing separate senior and mezzanine tranches — is the product that built the direct lending market: borrowers get one document set and one lender to negotiate with, and the fund earns a blended rate for holding what would have been two tranches of risk. If you'll write unitranche, say what through-leverage you'll hold and whether you'll sell first-out pieces to a bank partner.

Workout Capability Is an LP Question, Not a Hypothetical

Across a 5–7 year fund life some borrowers will breach covenants, and a few will need restructuring. Allocators ask directly: who on your team has run a workout, and what happened? The strong answer is a named person with a specific story — amendment negotiated, sponsor injected equity, exit at par plus fees; or the harder version, loan-to-own and a sale two years later with a recovery number.

This is also why covenant discipline matters more than yield at the margin: maintenance covenants exist to put you at the table while enterprise value still covers your tranche. A first-time team with no restructuring scar tissue should fill the gap visibly — an operating partner, a board member, or a standing relationship with a restructuring advisor named in the deck.

Closed-End Structure and the Terms LPs Expect

Multi-year illiquid loans make direct lending a closed-end strategy for first-time managers: capital commitments drawn as deals close, a 2–3 year investment period (often with recycling of repaid principal inside it), and a 5–7 year fund term with extensions. Evergreen direct lending vehicles exist at scale, but they demand liquidity management a first fund shouldn't promise.

Economics follow the credit pattern: management fee of 1.5–2%, increasingly charged on invested capital rather than commitments — LPs push hard on this in credit, where undrawn commitments earning fees is a sore point — and an incentive of 10–20% over a 6–8% hurdle, with income distributed quarterly as interest is collected. A European-style structure (return capital plus preferred before incentive) is the LP-friendly norm in credit and worth conceding early.

How Fund Launch Builds It

The Fund Builder models the fund — target raise, credit box parameters, investment period and recycling policy, fee basis, hurdle and incentive, distribution mechanics — so the leverage limits in your pitch are the ones in your documents. Scroll Deck presents the origination lane and covenant discipline with the fund's actual economics; Legal Canvas prepares the formation and offering documents for independent counsel review. The fund formation package is $6,000, documents prepared in days rather than months — leaving the calendar for the part that's genuinely slow, which is the raise and the pipeline.

Typical Terms

Ranges we see for emerging lower-middle-market direct lending funds. Credit terms, not buyout terms — the incentive is smaller and the fee base is watched closely.

TermTypical rangeNotes
Management fee1.5% – 2.0%On invested capital is increasingly the LP expectation in credit; fee on commitments is a negotiation you'll likely lose.
Preferred return / hurdle6% – 8%7% is the most common ask; income above it flows through the incentive split.
Incentive10% – 20% over the hurdle15% is a common landing spot for first-time credit managers; 20% needs a differentiated origination story.
Fund term5 – 7 years2–3 year investment period, often with recycling of repaid principal inside it, plus one- to two-year extensions.
DistributionsQuarterly from collected interestPrincipal repayments recycle during the investment period and return to LPs after it.
GP commitment1% – 3%Credit LPs read alignment from the GP commitment plus fee discipline more than from incentive size.

Typical ranges observed across private funds of this type. Actual terms depend on strategy, track record, and LP negotiation — treat these as orientation, not advice, and confirm your structure with counsel.

What LPs Will Ask

Where do your deals come from, and why does that flow come to you?

Origination is the scarce asset in direct lending. Named sponsor relationships with closed deals attached — or a non-sponsored sourcing engine with a live pipeline — is the answer; 'our network' is not.

What covenants do you actually get, and what have you waived?

Everyone claims covenant discipline; term sheets and amendment history prove it. LPs increasingly ask for anonymized examples of documentation on recent deals.

What leverage through your tranche, and what fixed-charge coverage do you require?

The two numbers that define how much cushion sits between a borrower's bad year and your impairment. A manager who quotes them instantly, with the credit box they come from, has one.

Who on the team has taken a loan through a restructuring?

Workouts are where direct lending returns are kept or lost. A named person and a specific outcome — or a named restructuring partner filling the gap — is the institutional answer.

If you write unitranche, how much through-leverage do you hold and do you sell first-out?

Unitranche blends two risk tranches into one facility. LPs want to know which part of that blended risk stays in their fund and on what economics.

How does the portfolio behave in a recession?

Cash-flow loans have no collateral floor. Industry mix, covenant cushions, and the watchlist process are the honest answer; a claim of no expected defaults over seven years is disqualifying.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do I need to raise for a direct lending fund?

Work backward from diversification: 15–25 positions is the credible minimum for a cash-flow lending book, so a fund writing $2M–$5M checks needs roughly $40M–$75M. Below that, managers run concentrated club-style funds with LP co-invest rights on larger deals, or start with separately managed accounts for one or two anchor investors and raise the commingled fund on that record.

Do I need a lending license to lend to businesses?

Commercial lending is far less licensed than consumer lending, but not unregulated: a handful of states (California among them) require lender licensing for business-purpose loans, and several regulate brokered commercial credit or impose commercial-disclosure regimes. The analysis depends on borrower state, loan size, and structure — have counsel map your intended footprint before the first close rather than after the first loan.

What returns do direct lending funds target?

Lower-middle-market senior loans have recently priced at high-single-digit to low-double-digit coupons, with original-issue discount and fees adding to gross yield; unitranche and non-sponsored deals price wider. LP net targets typically land in the high single digits to around 10% — presented as a target range, never a promise, since the asymmetry of lending means realized returns are set by the loans that go wrong, not the ones that go right.

Sponsored or non-sponsored — which should a first-time fund choose?

Choose the lane your history supports. Bankers and credit-fund alumni usually have sponsor relationships and should monetize them, accepting tighter pricing for warmer flow and sponsor support in workouts. Operators and lower-middle-market advisors often have proprietary access to founder-owned borrowers, which earns wider spreads but demands standalone diligence and workout capability. The honest disqualifier: non-sponsored lending without restructuring experience on the team is the combination LPs decline fastest.

Closed-end or evergreen for direct lending?

First funds should almost always be closed-end: multi-year illiquid loans match naturally to committed capital with a defined term, and LPs don't have to trust a new manager's liquidity management. Evergreen direct lending vehicles exist and grow at the institutional scale, but they require redemption machinery, valuation discipline, and a diversified seasoned book — a second- or third-vehicle decision, not a first-fund one.

Related Guides

Build Your Direct Lending Fund

Define the credit box, fund term, and economics once — Fund Launch turns them into the model, the deck, the offering documents, and the fund site, all telling the same story.

Start building your fund

This guide is educational material, not legal, tax, or investment advice. Fund Launch is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice; fund formation documents prepared on the platform are reviewed by independent counsel before use. Consult your own advisors about your specific situation.